Steven said: Must be something in the water this month. I read Scalzi's rebuttal and it took the edge off an argument that floats around the photoweb. An editorial on the Digital Journalist called photographers who take low pay assignments or work for exposure, Traitors. http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0704/common-cents.html Same line of protect the traditional business model and if you don't, you are the problem. Scalzi took that to task with his piece. It's too bad he's not a stock photographer. He has a great eye. Unfortunately on the photoweb good writers are far and few. Those that can write are often so bitter about the loss of stock income their business advice can be very toxic to the novice. Date: 4/16/2007 12:07:56 AM Steven said: Must be something in the water this month. I read Scalzi's rebuttal and it took the edge off an argument that floats around the photoweb. An editorial on the Digital Journalist called photographers who take low pay assignments or work for exposure, Traitors. http://www.digitaljournalist.org/issue0704/common-cents.html Same line of protect the traditional business model and if you don't, you are the problem. Scalzi took that to task with his piece. It's too bad he's not a stock photographer. He has a great eye. Unfortunately on the photoweb good writers are far and few. Those that can write are often so bitter about the loss of stock income their business advice can be very toxic to the novice. Date: 4/16/2007 12:07:56 AM

(Note: Thanks to a recent spam attack, all comments must be manually approved.) Add Yours:  Now type in your information. Name and Comment are required. Don't forget to let us know you're human! Name: Please enter a name Email: (not required, but needed if you use a gravatar) Website: Http:// (Note: The http:// automatically added to links. DO NOT add http://.) Add your comment below. (Handy thing to know: Hit the enter key twice for a paragraph break!) Comment: Cancel Please Enter a Comment Please read the Terms, updated 2/21/2018

Back